Search for: "Hamroff v Hamroff"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
It rarely succeeds and in Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 01969 [192 AD3d 1092] March 31, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department is denied outright. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
(Freeman v Brecher, 155AD3d 453,454 [1st Dept 2017], citing Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 13 [1st Dept 2008]; see also Kaufman v Maritt Hock Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2d Dept 2021] [“Relief pursuant to Judiciary Law S 487 ‘is not given lightly’ and requires a showing of ‘egregious conduct or chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of defendant attorneys’.]) [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am
Here, the proposed supplement to the complaint seeking to add a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 487 was “patently devoid of merit” (McIntosh v Ronit Realty, LLC, 181 AD3d 579, 580; see Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1092-1093). [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:23 pm
The ruling in Anonymous v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:50 am
See Landau v. [read post]
