Search for: "Hancock v. Board of Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
John Hancock Advisors, LLC, No. 10-3430A (Suffolk Super. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Mary Nobles Hancock, God Save the United States and this Honorable County Board of Commissioners: Lund, Bormuth, and the Fight Over Legislative Prayer, (76 Wash. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
“ Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the England (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaq only a provisional conclusion). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
In anticipation of the release the government announced that there will be ‘no legal changes,’ Matthew Hancock, the cabinet office minister who commissioned the report, said “after 10 years we took the decision to review the Freedom of Information Act and we have found it is working well. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:59 am
The Court of Appeals reverses.The case is Hancock v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 1:10 pm
August 23, 2007): Upon our review of the record, we find that neither the testimony of the law enforcement officers investigating this crime and the related documentary evidence nor the testimony of the class members established that each and every member of the class experienced a significant interruption of his or her freedom of movement so as to amount to an actionable seizure (see People v Bora, supra at 535-536; Landsman v Village of Hancock, 296 A.D.2d 728,… [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Such “further study” decisions by the Board could not operate so as to toll the 60 days allowed for review. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
The Benefits Review Board affirmed the award, concluding that plaintiff did not need to show the cause of her husband's death. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On Tuesday 11 June 2024, there was a pre-trial review hearing before Hill J in Organista v Rodrigues and another QB-2021-003806. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 16 May 2023, there was a pre-trial review hearing in the case of Leeds and another v Burgess and others. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
Inforrm has an article on the ban and the uncertain future of the oversight board. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Hancock & Anor v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 7 Dec 2018. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Last Week in the Courts On 26 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down in Hinds v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd [2024] EWHC 380 (KB). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm
Above the Law considers how companies need to engage with Data Protection laws at Board level. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Data Protection Board adopted its Strategy for 2021-2023, which outlines its objectives and key actions for the upcoming years. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
The ICO had a statement “Updated ICO statement on recommendations published by the European Data Protection Board following the Schrems II case”. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Considering the application of cryptology to law Stanford’s Cyberlaw blog reviews the practice and its application to technological policy debates. [read post]
