Search for: "Hancock v. Board of Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Such “further study” decisions by the Board could not operate so as to toll the 60 days allowed for review. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Last Week in the Courts On 26 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down in Hinds v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd [2024] EWHC 380 (KB). [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to review the ruling is very high. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 16 May 2023, there was a pre-trial review hearing in the case of Leeds and another v Burgess and others. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
By Sophia Williams From 1933 to 1945, during the Nazi party’s rise to power, the Nazis looted, confiscated, or involuntarily transferred more than half a million artworks owned by Jewish art collectors and other victims.[1] Following Nazi party looting before and after World War II, thousands of artworks ended up in museum collections around the world, including in New York, and remain there today.[2] A recent act passed in August 2022 “to amend the education law, in relation to notice… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Steve Brine, who served in Theresa May’s government until March 2019, messaged then-health secretary Matt Hancock about Remedium Partners. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
Inforrm has an article on the ban and the uncertain future of the oversight board. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Data Protection Board adopted its Strategy for 2021-2023, which outlines its objectives and key actions for the upcoming years. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
The ICO had a statement “Updated ICO statement on recommendations published by the European Data Protection Board following the Schrems II case”. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Hancock & Anor v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 7 Dec 2018. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Following the general rule applied in most jurisdictions, the court required a review of the costs without the cure of the internal road. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm
Above the Law considers how companies need to engage with Data Protection laws at Board level. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
“ Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the England (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaq only a provisional conclusion). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Mary Nobles Hancock, God Save the United States and this Honorable County Board of Commissioners: Lund, Bormuth, and the Fight Over Legislative Prayer, (76 Wash. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Considering the application of cryptology to law Stanford’s Cyberlaw blog reviews the practice and its application to technological policy debates. [read post]
