Search for: "Hand Trading Company v. Daniels"
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
While legal scholars have long recognized that shadow trading can be profitable, SEC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The hands and dial of a watch are undoubtedly useful, but their aesthetic qualities are trade dress. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
In Jack Daniels v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
On 18 February, the US imposed sanctions on Rosneft Trading SA (“RTSA“), a subsidiary of Russia’s state-owned oil producer, Rosneft, and the company’s Chairman, Didier Casimiro. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
Mitchell Stein, a publicly traded company’s in-house counsel, was convicted of fraud for a scheme to inflate the company’s stock prices. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
Chepiga, Daniel J. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood at University of Florida explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
As Professors Elizabeth Rowe and Daniel Mahfood explained in their pre-DTSA article, there were two main challenges when it came to using state trade secret law to reach out-of-state conduct. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
A 10b5-1 agreement establishes predetermined trading instructions for company stock (usually a sale and not a buy so not trading the shares) consistent with SEC rules under Section 10b5 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 covering when the insider can sell. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:21 pm
Relying on the 1983 seminal insider trading case, Dirks v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
On the other hand, if we allow too much disclosure then we might be putting a cap on liquidity to distressed securities. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Riscili v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:39 am
Daniel A. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
On the other hand, it claims that information relating to the technology is a trade secret. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:03 am
All but a handful of cases settle for a fraction of the claimed damages, and usually for a number suspiciously close to the limits of the company’s director and officer liability insurance policies. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
Looking for a hand-out? [read post]
