Search for: "Hand v. State Dept. of Human Resources"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
" The Appeals Court notes that while the beaches do contain asbestos fibers, several cited state and Federal studies have not found levels of asbestos sufficient to menace human health. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
In May or June 2009, Suri states that she complained to the human resources manager that Cirullo pulled her on and off projects and left her with no resources on one project. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
Colorado resource guide for cerebral palsy and individuals with special needs. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
Heller v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon purchased me I put all the aforementioned notes in his hands. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
Previously, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court had ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provisions. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
The petitioner in Solla brought suit to enforce an administrative decision previously entered by the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA), which had ordered the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) to restore the petitioner’s shelter allowance. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Dept. of Health & Human Services 23 serve as tactical guideposts. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Just as I was wrapping up this Quick Hits blog the Sixth Circuit handed down its decision in Brintley v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This is Part 4 (Data, Discretion, and Analytics in the Administrative State-Economic Enterprise Complex) which considers 2019 as the year that data driven governance, and the legal management of administrative and political decision making became a political, human rights and trade issue. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
