Search for: "Handel v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
C. v Zencolor Corp., 2015 WL 4206982, *6, 2015 US Dist LEXIS 90345, *14 (SD NY, July 10, 2015, No. 13- CV-5715 (JGK]) (finding that “allegations of improper billing-standing alone-[ did] not state a claim for legal malpractice,” where former client “[did] not allege that but for this improper billing, its patent applications would have been approved”); Byrne & Storm, P.C. v Handel, 2013 WL 2444092, *4, 2013 US Dist LEXIS 78708, *14-15… [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Related articles Jonathan Handel: WGA Ballots on the Way (huffingtonpost.com) Will Golan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:32 pm
Proposed EU information laws on prescription drugs (IPmed) Iceland: Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in Iceland (The SPC blog) India: Roche implements 'mass serialisation' anti-counterfeiting technology (Spicy IP) Indonesia: Patent application on oil palm hybrids (navigating the patent maze) United States: New PMCA research: State legislative proposals restricting access to generic medicines would increase cost $29 billion over 10 years (GenericsWeb) US:… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
Nault v Evangelical Lutheran Full.pdf Sponsored Topics: United States - Court - Government - Judicial Branch - Federal Courts [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
In Case T‑149/06 Castellani v OHIM – Markant Handels und Service (CASTELLANI) [noted by the IPKat here], when the General Court held, in assessing the existence of a likelihood of confusion, the German consumer of wine was accustomed to seeing a large number of trade marks for wine the names of which began with ‘Schloss’, ‘castello’, ‘château’, ‘castel’ or ‘castle’. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Nederland Octrooibureau (EPLAW) Court of Appeal The Hague refuses to guarantee full costs in patent proceedings filed prior to expiry of Enforcement Directive implementation deadline: Van Beelen Industrie en Handel B.V. v Otter Ultra Low Drag Limited (EPLAW)   Nigeria Guinness: Broiled and embroiled – Musical Copyright Society Nigeria alleges infringement of musical works; Guinness argues MCSN not licensed to operate as collecting society at the time (Afro-IP)  … [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  A similar decision was found in In re Muller, 417 F.2d 1387 (CCPA 1969), as well as in Hewlett–Packard Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm
Last week the IPKat was too busy stuffing himself with chocolate mice to notice the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Case C 276/05, The Wellcome Foundation Ltd v Paranova Pharmazeutika Handels GmbH, a reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof in May 2005 -- which is a longer time ago than most Kats can remember. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
DSM Food Specialties (EPLAW) Court of Appeal The Hague: No indirect infringement  by delivering ‘stealth rope’ to trawl net makers: Van Beelen Industrie en Handel v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am by Jon Gelman
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum  of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their  intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed  witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]