Search for: "Hankin v. Hankin"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 4:44 am
In a short, one line reversal, the Court of Appeals put to rest a very old legal malpractice case, Gotay v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:38 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Arkansas Rule of Evidence 606(b) indicates that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
And in Lin v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
*Hankins v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
” First Amendment - Religion: In addition to her dissent in Hankins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:59 pm
Hankins (2003). [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division ruled that Hankin attempted to use the subpoena duces tecum improperly and such a subpoena "may not be used for purposes of discovery or to ascertain the existence of evidence" [Board of Educ. of City of New York v Hankins 294 A.D.2d 360].Sometimes an individual served with disciplinary charges will demand "a bill of particulars" requiring the appointing authority to set out the charges and specifications filed against the… [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 11:35 am
In Thaxton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:15 am
Subpoena Duces TecumBd. of Educ. v Hankins, App. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:01 pm
Cote, No. 06-1041 In a Title VII suit instituted by a Catholic priest against a bishop and a diocese alleging racial discrimination in a denial of a promotion and tyhe termination of his employment, dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction is affirmed where: 1) Hankins v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankruptcy
Minister's Age Discrimination Suit Dismissed; Action Would Breach Religious Freedom and Restoration Act
Hankins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 11:34 pm
In Hankins v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 10:16 pm
A few district courts had rejected the argument, see Hankins v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:16 pm
A few district courts had rejected the argument, see Hankins v. [read post]
