Search for: "Harbour v. Harbour"
Results 181 - 200
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-12-10 https://t.co/URJoDaJami 2017-12-11 Inventor has no right to sue for patent infringement where patent assigned Rowland v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Conference on RPM - On December 4, a conference was held in Washington, D.C. on the topic of resale price maintenance ("RPM") by consumer advocates, regulators, and policy experts opposed to RPM.Minimum RPM has emerged as a hot topic in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:31 am
An ISP serving as a mere conduit would not incur liability for trade mark infringement under English law even in the absence of the safe harbour provisions. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:19 pm
This encompasses the issue of whether a search engine operator can rely on the caching defence (under article 13 of the E-Commerce Directive) or any other safe harbour defence in circumstances in which a data subject has relied on the RTBF. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
A closer look at Hospira v Cubist and daptomycin micellesIPKat returns to the Hospira v Cubist case to look in more detail at the claim relating to purifying daptomycin by altering by PH.* My My Mylan: The Trademark Silver Lining for Mylan's EPIPENMylan has recently come under fire for raising the price of the EPIPEN. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:29 am
Thus, absent an attorney-client relationship, a cause of action for legal malpractice cannot be stated (Baystone Equities, Inc. v Handel-Harbour, 27 AD3d 231 [2006]; Linden v Moskowitz, 294 AD2d 114, 115 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 505 [2003]). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
In this case, I admit to harbouring very considerable doubts that it is. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:16 am
The byelaws were properly made and published in 1931under section 88 of the Harbours, Docks and Piers Clauses Act 1847. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:33 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankruptcyBankruptcy Court Properly Based Its Good Faith Finding on Evidence Presented at Sale HearingBay Harbour Management LC v. [read post]
Rome Court of First instances confirms once again that takedown requests do not need to include URLs
18 Jul 2016, 6:56 am
In its seminal decision in L'Oréal, in fact, that the CJEU suggested [para 122] that safe harbour protections cannot be trumped by "notifications of allegedly illegal activities or information [that are] insufficiently precise or inadequately substantiated". [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
On appeal, the Court agreed with Judge Stanton’s interpretation of the knowledge requirement stating that under Section 512(c)(1)(A) knowledge alone will not disqualify a service provider from the safe harbour protection. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
NZ global mode ISPs to be sued for copyright infringement http://t.co/zcaAS2IQMu -> Pirate Bay Co-Founder Unable To Experience The Joys Of NES Behind Bars http://t.co/SBGsRgVgFl -> Record Labels Accuse YouTube Of Causing Them To Lose Money http://t.co/mqHp07gxzz -> HBO Criticizes Periscope Over 'Game of Thrones' Live Streams, Issues Take-Down Notices http://t.co/CMoO1BtgMi -> Proposed new Australia website blocking powers for the Federal Court http://t.co/95w81zyKD2 -> World… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Here's my table attempting a summary of recent CJEU case law http://t.co/prOYQYqt3K -> Donald Trump Receives Legal Threat Over Use of Aerosmith's "Dream On" http://t.co/mz1EwXAVe2 -> Interview: Brett Wilson v Persons Unknown, corporate defamation claims and claims against anonymous third parties https://t.co/tDsgDfNcXo -> (Un)Safe Harbour: Stop! [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
"Just less than three years after the Court decided Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:10 pm
The case is Associated British Ports v Tata Steel UK Limited. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
In Tranquil Harbour Dev., LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
French agencies accuse Facebook of breaching data privacy laws https://t.co/3xWiFV09xW -> YouTube Rulings Emphasize the Importance of an OSP’s Terms of Service in Social Media Marketing https://t.co/7SEGsgt64A -> Consumer Fraud, Unfair Trade Practices, and Internet Purchases https://t.co/vtSGdE5hhW -> Brein steps up anti-piracy moves https://t.co/WHJ6pEe3Li -> Advocate General opinion: offering free wifi is subject to EU safe harbour https://t.co/iqKRxXojIZ -> RT… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
In the case of Tranquil Harbour Development, LLC v. [read post]
