Search for: "Harbour v. Harbour" Results 21 - 40 of 563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Google as a host v Google as a search engine It is also important in this debate to assess whether there is any difference between Google as a search engine and Google as a host of websites. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:44 am by sally
Tristmire Ltd v Mew and another [2011] EWCA Civ 912; [2011] WLR (D) 271 “A houseboat placed on a supporting platform in a harbour did not have a degree of permanence such as to make it part of the plot on which the platform stood so that a tenancy or licence of the plot would extend to the houseboat. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 1037 (25 August 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Deutsche Bank Ag v Tongkah Harbour Public Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 2251 (QB) (24 August 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Yameen, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2250 (Admin) (25 August 2011) Sino, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:28 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Devoy v William Doxford & Sons Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 1598 (QB) (21 July 2009) Azaz v Denton & Anor [2009] EWHC 1759 (QB) (21 July 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Howell & Ors v Lees-Millais & Ors [2009] EWHC 1754 (Ch) (17 July 2009) National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc v McKenzie Harbour [...] [read post]
12 May 2013, 1:38 pm by admin
In this regard, in one of the few Canadian cases to consider the fisherman exemption (Couture v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
It thus denied Cox the § 512(a) DMCA safe harbour defence. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by mtlawlibrary
Montana State Fund DA 20-0113 2020 MT 159N Civil – Workers’ Compensation Marriage of Kerr DA 19-0276 2020 MT 158N Civil – Domestic Relations Harbour v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:09 am by Huťko
While these cases can wait, CJEU's new ruling - Papasavvas C-291/03 - on safe harbours [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:09 am by Huťko
While these cases can wait, CJEU's new ruling - Papasavvas C-291/03 - on safe harbours [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
After the confusing (to say the least) CJEU’s guidelines on how an ISP should behave to be considered “neutral” [ie not active, ie eligible to benefit from the safe harbour] in Google France v LVMH and L’Oréal v eBay, such national courts pointed out that a non-neutral approach towards the data stored cannot be inferred from the provision of automatic services in addition to the mere hosting [such the “related… [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 5:09 am
Topazio, one of the soap operas produced by Delta TVIs YouTube an active host and, if so, ineligible for the safe harbour protection within Article 14 of the E-commerce Directive? [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Jason C. Gavejian
Safe Harbour agreement which was invalidated on October 6, 2015, by the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
 IVDP then appealed to the General Court on several grounds.The decisionIn Case T‑659/14 IVDP v OHIM (PORT CHARLOTTE) General Court held:“…it is clear that neither the provisions of Regulation No 491/2009, nor those of Regulation No 207/2009, state that the protection under the former must be construed as being exhaustive in the sense that that protection cannot be supplemented, beyond its particular scope, by another system of protection. [read post]