Search for: "Harbour v. Harbour"
Results 101 - 120
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
That safe harbour is granted under EC legislation. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 2:35 am
In the best glory of the "active provider theory", the claimants claimed that Dailymotion could not enjoy the 'safe harbour' protection of the E-Commerce Directive and that a strict liability regime should be applied instead. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:21 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Iqbal v Mansoor & Ors [2011] EWHC 2261 (QB) (26 August 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Elvington Park Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Crown Court At York [2011] EWHC 2213 (Admin) (26 August 2011) Scarth (The Living Man) v Governor of HM Prison Armley & Anor [2011] EWHC 2269 (Admin) (26 August 2011) Modhej, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 2267 (Admin)… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
An area map of the V&A Waterfront. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:47 am
NAM violated the FCRA and Regulation V by failing to establish and implement adequate policies and procedures regarding the accuracy and integrity of information furnished to consumer reporting agencies. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
.* BREAKING: CJEU says that free Wi-Fi provider is not liable for third-party copyright infringements but may be required to password-protect its network to terminate infringements As Eleonora reports, the CJEU made a landmark decision on the subject of intermediary liability and protection by safe harbours for unlawful uses of free Wi-Fi services. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Clarke, R (on the application of) v Cardiff University [2009] EWHC 2148 (Admin) was a judicial review of Cardiff University Law School brought by a BVC student from 2004/5, Ms Clarke. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:25 am
There's Baigent v Random House Group Ltd, a.k.a. the Da Vinci Files case, and there's also the Court of Appeal's much pronounced-upon pronouncement in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd/re Macrossan's application.IPKat posts on Da Vinci here and hereIPKat posts on Macrossan and its impact here, here, here, here, here, here and hereIf you have harboured any delusions that European Union consumer policy might in any way be connected with intellectual… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-12-04 https://t.co/184Iv9xZFl 2017-12-05 Security for costs of copyright certification motion awarded Voltage Pictures, LLLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shabir, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 854 (07 March 2008) Zotiades, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 753 (14 March 2008) Fisher, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 714 (14 March 2008) Giga, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 703 (18 March 2008) Ikram & Anor, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 586 (19 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Honeygan-Green v London Borough of Islington [2008] EWCA Civ 363 (22 April 2008) Looe Fuels Ltd v Looe… [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
In Elkins v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:13 am
The Court of Appeal has taken a pragmatic view, noting that the negotiation framework set out by the European Court of Justice in Huawei v ZTE provides a ‘safe harbour’ for SEP owners but does not set out mandatory conditions for negotiations. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
In this regard, it is also worth noting that, unlike both Article 17 (which excludes the availability of hosting safe harbour in relation to situation covered by that provision) and what the referring court appears to think by looking at how the referred questions have been phrased, the AG considers that the hosting safe harbour is available irrespective of the type of liability at hand.All in allIn conclusion, when it comes to UUC platforms, the AG considers that liability… [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:28 am
The Court preferred the view of the minority of the ECtHR in Ostendorf v Germany (App. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm
The Library of Parliament recently published its legislative summary of Bill S-7, the Combating Terrorism Act (short title):"It is a 30-clause bill which: amends section 7(2) of the Criminal Code, which describes acts or omissions in relation to aircraft, airports and air navigation systems that have taken place outside Canada, and which, by operation of section 7(2) and section 83.01(1)(a) of the Code, constitute 'terrorist activity' (clause 2);introduce new terrorism offences to… [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 4:44 am
The center-stage of this brief article is the Court’s recent decision in Mc Fadden v Sony Germany and its short-term and long-term consequences for the future of safe harbours, their scope and IP enforcement. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 4:44 am
The center-stage of this brief article is the Court’s recent decision in Mc Fadden v Sony Germany and its short-term and long-term consequences for the future of safe harbours, their scope and IP enforcement. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:55 am
The Court in Harbor Homes v. [read post]
