Search for: "Hargrove v. Taylor" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2007, 2:59 am
§ 7003 (2000).4  Taylor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson &… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson &… [read post]