Search for: "Harjo v. State"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
The Board again applied the test of Harjo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:17 am
In Matal v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: US Supreme Court refuses to hear Chicago Redskins complaint: Suzan Harjo v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
US Trademarks USTrademarkExchange.com: New web service for sale of registered trade marks (IP finance) Think outside the trademark box – staying on top of recent developments in other areas of IP law can help trade mark owners be more strategic in trying cases (Managing Intellectual Property) US Trade Marks – Decisions Court of Appeal for District of Columbia affirms laches ruling dismissing REDSKINS cancellation: Pro-Football v Harjo… [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:02 am
In Pro Football v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) An appeal to the new Patent Office Director: Repeal the single sentence rule (Patently-O) ‘Troll Tracker’ defamation suit - trial underway: Albritton v Cisco (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (The Prior Art) Q2 2009 sees record number of US green patents (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: District Court’s summary judgment opinion found to be inconsistent with its own claim construction: Vita-Mix… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
V Secret v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” The state has designated Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
