Search for: "Harjo v. State"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
 The question raised in Harjo, et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-326 Title: Harjo v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Susan Harjo v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) An appeal to the new Patent Office Director: Repeal the single sentence rule (Patently-O) ‘Troll Tracker’ defamation suit - trial underway: Albritton v Cisco (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (The Prior Art) Q2 2009 sees record number of US green patents (Green Patent Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: District Court’s summary judgment opinion found to be inconsistent with its own claim construction: Vita-Mix… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Finally, the BLT covers the ongoing legal battle over the appropriateness of the name "Redskins" as the moniker for Washington's NFL football franchise, reporting that lawyers for a group of Native Americans filed a cert petition today in Susan Harjo v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
US Trademarks USTrademarkExchange.com: New web service for sale of registered trade marks (IP finance) Think outside the trademark box – staying on top of recent developments in other areas of IP law can help trade mark owners be more strategic in trying cases (Managing Intellectual Property) US Trade Marks – Decisions Court of Appeal for District of Columbia affirms laches ruling dismissing REDSKINS cancellation: Pro-Football v Harjo… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
17 May 2009, 4:36 pm
As the court ruled in Harjo v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:02 am
In Pro Football v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
The Board again applied the test of Harjo v. [read post]
