Search for: "Harley v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 10:50 am by Mark Zamora
Other states' rulings and opinions:Zimmerman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:52 am by emagraken
I think the Defendants’ counsel is correct in stating that access to justice is a two-way street. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am by admin
State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 225-227; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
  While the article states that Stone filed a complaint with the Consumer Protection Division of the Iowa Attorney General’s Office, I imagine Anchor has or will have an even bigger problem with Harley-Davidson, which probably won’t be too pleased to learn of Anchor’s sale of a counterfeit Harley truck. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
We return today to the case of the day from September 27, 2011, H-D Michigan, LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 11:52 pm by admin
Harley-Davison is recalling a total of 308,000 motorcycles with approximately 250,000 units affected in the United States due to a brake issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Connie Gibilaro
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm
"However, according to CNN, Harley Lewin for Louboutin stated that he has never received such support from fellow attorneys, law professors and the fashion industry telling him"This [verdict] is an abomination. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Following the hearing Harley Lewin, one of Louboutin's lawyers, stated that"This is the lifeblood of this company, the red sole. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:56 am by By Erik Lundegaard
Helping to propel her career have been a number of landmark cases, including Thompson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
“In 1989, this Court considered a claim against the State in Sweeney v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm
“Rather, it is a case like many others in which, given the current state of knowledge, it is not possible to prove whether the negligent actions of a defendant caused harm. [read post]