Search for: "Harmelin v. Michigan"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Harmelin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
See Harmelin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
See Harmelin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
She cited to the excessive post-Civil War fines in the South designed to subjugate newly freed slaves and maintain the racial hierarchy.Citing the landmark case, Harmelin v Michigan, Justice Ginsburg continued:For good reason, the protection against excessive fines has been a constant shield throughout Anglo-American history: Exorbitant tolls undermine other constitutional liberties. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:01 pm
” Slip op. at 6 (quoting Harmelin v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
" Harmelin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
Harmelin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Michigan, Pulley v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
Harmelin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 8:40 pm
This view stems from Justice Scalia’s plurality opinion in 1991 in Harmelin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm
Helm, Harmelin v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm
From the time of its decision in Harmelin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:59 pm
Here is the abstract:In Harmelin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Eight years later, though, the Court backed off of that, upholding in Harmelin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
Thirteen years later, in Harmelin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:26 am
Thirteen years later, in Harmelin v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
Roberts recognized a proportionality requirement at variance with Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Harmelin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:07 am
Michigan and Ewing v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:32 pm
The name of the case is Harmelin v. [read post]
