Search for: "Harmon v. Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044 The Foundation filed suit against the Department for failure to comply with CEQA, arguing that the Department’s inaction to maintain and repair the roof of a historic former hotel that it owned was an agency decision subject to CEQA. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044 The Foundation filed suit against the Department for failure to comply with CEQA, arguing that the Department’s inaction to maintain and repair the roof of a historic former hotel that it owned was an agency decision subject to CEQA. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
The Act does not specify how the Collective is to harmonize “transparency” with “confidentiality. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
”The court in Alcharihi v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:10 pm
(Hsu v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Yates, the Justice Department was not even permitted to defend the order. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:21 pm
The Court of International Trade decision in United Steels and Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645, 656, fn. 8), and that “cases have wrestled with this distinction[.] [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:15 pm
NYS Department of Corrections & Community Supervision, 2016 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:44 am
Coauthored with Elliot Harmon, republished from EFF's Deeplinks Blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
The Justice Department opposed review by the Justices, conceding that there was some disagreement among lower courts but that the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling was the correct one. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
It chose not to respond extensively to Ethics Council inquiries.In September, the Council had a telephone meeting with an employee from ZTE’s Security & Investor Relations Department and an employee from the company’s legal department. [read post]
