Search for: "Harmon v. Givens" Results 41 - 60 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
 The materiality of that difference is that the trial judge will have to decide whether the actual evidence given or sought to be given is admissible whereas, in these circumstances the decision is whether if the facts pleaded are proved then those facts would be admissible and could be relevant.As such, the Judge agreed that the Deputy Master was entitled to find that the first part of the test was satisfied. in that he could conclude that the case of copying might be… [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:02 am by Tom Webley
Given that the FAR is inextricably linked to heavy-handed notions of government oversight and regulations, attempting to harmonize the FAR with private industry processes may be a tall, if not impossible, task. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:58 am by Kevin Tottis
Supreme Court Punts on Costco First Sale Copyright CaseUnited States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:16 am
Given the amount of wisdom it imparts, it is exceptionally good value.David's particular bugbears are evident including the fact that designs only protect visual features (not those experienced by other senses) and the identity of the informed user (for the few unfamiliar, he's not a fan of the approach taken in the infamous pogs case PepsiCo, Inc. v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic SA. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:15 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Katherine Sartain* If you are scoring at home, count Permico Royalties LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am by Eric Goldman
Given the CCPA’s newness, it’s disingenuous to adversely interpret the lack of precedent. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even though the Charter does expressly protect intellectual property, the rights given to rightsholders are not absolute. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even though the Charter does expressly protect intellectual property, the rights given to rightsholders are not absolute. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:15 am
Belgium; JGC Corp. v, Spain; plain packaging; global supply chain; intellectual properties; interaction between trade and investment law; geopolitics of the TPP; transparency; harmonization; standards of protection; investor-state dispute settlement. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Argument: given the pushback CDSM has received in Europe, this might be an opportunity to harmonize down. [read post]