Search for: "Harmon v. Givens" Results 121 - 140 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not 9. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Paula Lombardi
In R v Great Lakes Stevedoring Company Ltd,[1]companies are given a stark reminder that provincial environmental laws and regulations must be complied with notwithstanding compliance with all applicable federal laws and regulations and operating exclusively on federal property. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
(877) 917-5250 Recent FDA Recalls Not all FDA recalls are given press releases or are posted on the FDA recall list on the agency’s website. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
As such, it must (unsurprisingly) be interpreted in the light of its usual meaning and the context in which it is generally used.Agreeing with the AG, the Court further observed that:that concept refers, in its usual sense, to the fundamental moral values and standards to which a society adheres at a given time. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
 The materiality of that difference is that the trial judge will have to decide whether the actual evidence given or sought to be given is admissible whereas, in these circumstances the decision is whether if the facts pleaded are proved then those facts would be admissible and could be relevant.As such, the Judge agreed that the Deputy Master was entitled to find that the first part of the test was satisfied. in that he could conclude that the case of copying might be… [read post]
The court of appeals held that great deference must be given to a public agency’s finding of consistency with its own General Plan. [read post]
The court of appeals held that great deference must be given to a public agency’s finding of consistency with its own General Plan. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Peter S. Margulies
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We need to balance what’s given and taken away. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
  The document details the projects for which the SPC judicial committee had given project initiation/approval (立项), designating one or more SPC divisions/offices with primary drafting responsibility (this process to be detailed in a forthcoming article). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
Company Law Interpretation (V) (Issued in late April, text found here, official commentary here). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am by Mercedes Samavi and Alja Poler De Zwart
Website operators are required to inform users about: (i) cookie retention periods and (ii) whether third parties are given access to the cookies. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am by Mercedes Samavi and Alja Poler De Zwart
Website operators are required to inform users about: (i) cookie retention periods and (ii) whether third parties are given access to the cookies. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Supreme Court majority kicked that question down the line in its 2018 Lucia v. [read post]