Search for: "Harms v. Capital One National Association et al"
Results 41 - 48
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The book surveys both substantive law affecting FDI and investment dispute resolution law and practice, focusing on major capital exporting and importing countries in the region (especially Japan, China, India, Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam). [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
Growing cigarette tax differentials have made cigarette smuggling both a national problem and a lucrative criminal enterprise. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Insurance carriers also may view federal forum provisions as reducing litigation risks associated with public offerings and adjust premiums accordingly. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
Mergers and acquisitions are regulated under the Clayton Act, which states: "No person shall acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or any other share capital... of the assets of one or more persons engaged in commerce or in any activity affecting commerce, where... the effect of such acquisition, of such stocks or assets, or of the use of suck stock by the voting or granting of proxies or otherwise, may be substantially to lessen competition, or… [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The apparent present ability to cause the harm if not prevented. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
While access to state appellate courts is broad, it is clear that state practices at the trial level vary, from the broad allowance in a state such as Florida, where electronic media and still photography coverage of a proceeding is allowed in both appellate and trial courts, to the complete ban in our nation's capital. [read post]
