Search for: "Harper v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 7:31 am
Harper”) and Deborah Harper, against appellees, Timothy Smith and Kathleen Smith (“Ms. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Harper’s enduring legacy. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:53 pm
Harper, Bill Dorris, David Smith, and Elliott Levitas, attorneys at Kilpatrick Stockton LLP. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Harper v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:42 pm
Harper v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:55 pm
On November 29, 2010, the Court denied certiorari in two copyright cases, Harper v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:42 pm
The brief urges the Court to reconsider Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
The court held in the cases of People v Harper, People v Thomas, Smith v Commissioner of Motor Vehicles and People v Schook that a roadside Alco-Sensor screening test is sufficiently reliable for use in determining the presence of alcohol on a pass/fail basis, if properly administered an Alco-Sensor test can help establish probable cause for the arrest of a DWI suspect. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
But the “third-party doctrine” as found in Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 9:14 am
The first, 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Smith and Babak Siavoshy at ACSblog. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:12 am
(Image Michelle V. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
In Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Davis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 9:06 pm
In today’s case (Falbo v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
