Search for: "Harper v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 4:28 am by Walter Olson
” [WKMG Orlando] Retired Justice John Paul Stevens isn’t buying the “Thomas should recuse” meme [USA Today via Legal Ethics Forum] Not COPPA-cetic: among other unintended consequences, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has encouraged parents to help kids to falsify ages online [Danah Boyd via Jim Harper, Suderman, Reason, Stewart Baker, earlier] Lawmaking from the bench: Maryland high court strikes down law limiting landlords’… [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
Marxism in the USA: From 1870 to the Present Day (Verso, 1987).Case, John and Rosemary C.R. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
At Cato@Liberty, Jim Harper discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am by Kelly
Highlights this week included: US: Prosecutors dismiss Xbox-modding case mid-trial: USA v Crippen (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (1709 Blog) CAFC: Section 101 and process claims: Research Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
… As we said in Harper & Row, this idea/expression dichotomy strike[s] a definitional balan [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
Cooper (GrayCrown), by journalist Geoffrey Gray (here); The Golden Empire: Spain, Charles V, and the Creation of America (Random House), by British historian Hugh Thomas (here); and the prison memoir Then They Came for Me: A Family’s Story of Love, Captivity, and Survival (Random House), by Iranian Canadian journalist/filmmaker Maziar Bahari with Aimee Molloy (here).For lighter fare, head to the New York Times, where you'll find a review of THE BIG SCRUM: How Teddy Roosevelt… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Death penalty USA, 2001-2002 (2009) and Death penalty USA 2003 - 2004 (2008) and Death penalty USA 2005 - 2006 (2008). [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
David Kravets at Wired reports on a petition for certiorari that was filed recently in Harper v. [read post]