Search for: "Harrington v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
” Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
My preview suggested that Monday’s argument in Law v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:25 pm
McAninch can condemn a state court’s harmless-error decision as “so lacking in justification that there was an error well understood and comprehended in existing law beyond any possibility for fairminded disagreement,” Harrington v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
And then SCOTUS added a gloss in Harrington v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
McClellan, 12-1480 (after five relists), prompting a dissent from Justice Alito (joined by Justice Scalia), arguing that, contrary to the Sixth Circuit’s “serious misreading” of Harrington v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
H-Net adds some interesting reviews this week, including one of David V. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:30 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Carey v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:14 pm
” In Harrington v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
