Search for: "Harrington v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.609(a)(2) provides that Evidence that any witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if it involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am by thejaghunter
AMAZING GRACE – TAPS (click here) Norman Rockwell – “Mending the Flag” 27 May 1922) (CLICK ON IMAGE) MEMORIAL DAY 2011 (click here) Sergeant of Marines Timothy Joseph Harrington spent nine-hours in constructing the post linked above. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:06 pm by Christine Dowling
  Subsequently, the Court fired a torpedo amidships in Harrington v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:49 am by sally
Supreme Court Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Ltd & Ors (Ver 2) [2011] UKSC 17 (6 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jenson & Anor v Faux [2011] EWCA Civ 423 (13 April 2011) Garratt v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 425 (13 April 2011) Secretary of State for the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Affairs v Maftah & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 350 (13 April 2011) Corporation of the Hall of Arts and Sciences v The Albert… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Health lawK3260.3 .G58 2010Global health and human rights : legal and philosophical perspectives / edited by John Harrington and Maria Stuttaford.London New York : Routledge, 2010. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
” Accordingly, the Circuit Court concluded, Carter was not engaging in constitutionally protected speech at any relevant time and cannot make out a First Amendment claim.As to Carter’s claim that he was deprived of a protected property interest without due process of law, the Circuit Court of Appeals said that “To state a claim for deprivation of property without due process of law, a plaintiff must, as a preliminary matter, ‘identify a property interest protected by… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:03 am by Eric E. Johnson
The post also provides some brief analysis of the relation of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm by Stephen Page
As but one example of the concerns to which I refer, Ceci and Bruck, presenting the Amicus Brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:28 pm
On January 19, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Harrington v. [read post]