Search for: "Harrington v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by John Elwood
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
”) At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood writes about a petition that has been relisted twice, Harrington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
Sellers16-6855Issue: Whether the court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm by Mark Walsh
“I note that memorial drapery has been placed on the door of our courtroom to signify mourning for” O’Connor, the chief justice told a packed courtroom present for oral arguments in the bankruptcy case Harrington v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Jim Harrington asked Judge Pohl to appoint a monitor to be a point of contact for Binalshibh’s complaints. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The result is the stated reduction in child support payments to the custodial parent. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Barbara Moreno
Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer, Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am by Eliana Baer
Just ahead of the effective date of the statute, Judge Jones issued an opinion on the effect of one child’s emancipation in Harrington v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]