Search for: "Harris v State" Results 1 - 20 of 5,669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am by John Floyd
  Within this due process safeguard (made applicable to the states by the Fourteen Amendment), the “right to remain silent” was born in 1966 in Miranda v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The High Court has rejected the application of News Group Newspapers to delay the trial in the unlawful information gathering claim brought by Prince Harry. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The Biden-Harris Administration’s release of the United States’ second National Action Plan (NAP) on Responsible Business Conduct reflects a whole-of-government commitment to strengthen RBC. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]