Search for: "Harris v. Change, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 5:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, also known as estoppel against inconsistent positions, a party may not take a position in a legal proceeding that is contrary to a position he or she took in a prior proceeding, simply because his or her interests have changed” (Bihn v Connelly, 162 AD3d 626, 627; see Archer v Beach Car Serv., Inc., 180 AD3d 857, 861). [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:40 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering here and participating and contributing to the discussions in our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
The UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic submitted a brief in an interesting New Jersey trial court case a few weeks ago (Petro-Lubricant Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:10 am by Greg Mersol
Second, as to the case itself, the district court denied certification due to a lack of commonality under Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:45 am by Leila Wozniak
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, 2018 WL 3127423, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
While district courts generally have inherent authority and discretion regarding the “manage[ment of] their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases,” see PDC Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]