Search for: "Harris v. City of Santa Monica" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 6:26 pm by The Recorder
City of Santa Monica, the high court on Wednesday said no thanks to a bitterly fought contest between Angela Alioto and Altshuler Berzon on one side and Lucasfilm Ltd. on the other. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:26 pm by The Recorder
City of Santa Monica, the high court on Wednesday said no thanks to a bitterly fought contest between Angela Alioto and Altshuler Berzon on one side and Lucasfilm Ltd. on the other. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
City of Santa Monica oral argument, and I believe that he is likely the one turning the Court's focus to the remedies available here. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
City of Santa Monica, but even if you do not practice in this area, the prevalence of arbitration agreements in employment makes this a very important case. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
City of Santa Monica, the issues it settles, and the questions it leaves for another day. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:58 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
City of Santa Monica, centered around a pregnant city employee who was fired by the city. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:36 am
The California Supreme Court just made a mixed up jumble of this mixed motive law in Harris v City of Santa Monica (2013) 13 C.D.O.S. 1516. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
City of Santa Monica, but a few people have asked for more information on the webinar, which will air on February 22, 2013, from 12:00 to 1:15 p.m. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:50 am by Marytza J. Reyes
City of Santa Monica, announcing whether and to what extent a “mixed motive” defense is available to an employer under the Fair Employment Housing Act (“FEHA”). [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:16 pm by Robertson Branigan
City of Santa Monica as a compromise between employee rights and business’ freedom to terminate employees. [read post]