Search for: "Harris v. Lord" Results 1 - 20 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Irvine clearly disagreed flatly will all of this “prevailing orthodoxy”, pointing out the enervating effect of this reasoning in Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal) [2011] UKSC 43, in which Lord Hope seemed afraid (paragraphs 67-72) to go further than Strasbourg has gone as he put it more than once. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Now if only we’d had this Lords decision about 10, or 20 years ago… Credit to: On White, solicitor Tony Fearnley of Keoghs and Nicholls, Lindsell and Harris [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am by INFORRM
Lord Hope of Craighead provided such a definition in Campbell v MGN. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:24 pm by Buce
But he does offer one provocative takeaway: it was he Spaniards wot done—more precisely, the Castilians, the men on horseback, the feudal lords who trailed in with the baggage of Hapsburg Emperor Charles V. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am by tracey
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones… [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
The Jones and Harry opinions echo, without citation, Lord Mansfield's words in Somerset v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Another motivation of humility will have been to avoid the specter of anything more robust than press self-regulation, which Lord Justice Leveson had described as the press effectively marking their own homework. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
”  With these words Lord Sumption begins the systematic demolition of an edifice first constructed in 1908 in Poulton v Adjustable Cover and Boiler Block Co, and subsequently extended in Coflexip v Stolt (2004), Unilin v Berry (2007) and in this case, Virgin v Zodiac (2009). [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 1:47 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
The news Prince Harry and those photographs Unsurprisingly, the legal blogs had a lot to say about the publication of the naked photos of Prince Harry. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
He says that it was not correct of Mr Harris QC to say that much of the evidence has already been gathered to support their methodology. 1235: Mr Hoskins QC says Mr Harris QC’s proposed methodology does not reveal what is practicable at certification stage. 1232: Lord Briggs asks if ‘preferability’ is different to ‘commonality’ in the Canadian legislation. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Clause 4 is a ‘reasonable publication’ defence not a ‘responsible publication’ defence reflecting the latest common law as outlined by Lord Brown in Flood v Times. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
Mr Harris QC disagrees and says that this can be dealt with in more detail tomorrow. 15:51: Mr Harris QC notes points about form. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:39 pm by WSLL
Harris of Harris Law Firm, Evanston, Wyoming Representing Appellee (Defendant): Raymond W. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am by Rosalind English
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
"The District Court analyses leading case law in the issue of transformative and derivative works (such as Castle Rock Entertainment v. [read post]