Search for: "Harris v. Powers"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am
“Author of Roe,” my old boss, Justice Harry A. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
But the Wills Variation Act does not give the court the power to vary dispositions outside of a will. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
In Davis v Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:49 am
Harry First, an antitrust professor at NYU, received an email yesterday with news of Alcoa’s $26.9 billion bid for Alcan. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:59 am
See Bear Creek Township v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Ambrose Harris (Procurator Fiscal), HM Advocate v G : HM Advocate v M [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) – read judgment Reliance on evidence that emerged from questioning a person without access to a lawyer did not invariably breach the right to a fair trial under Article 6. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm
Coakley Labor Unions – Harris v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:29 am
Harris). [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm
Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp., 168 F.3d 967 (1999)), (Harris v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
The "representative product of the sturdy democratic traditions of the Mississippi Valley" was Harry Truman, who had accreted a little too much power. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
Specifically at issue in the case of Trump v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
The New York Times discusses the separation-of-powers issues involved in Kiyemba v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 6:30 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:29 am
Beginning with Williams v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 1:36 pm
"- Harris V. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
OPINION EVELYN V. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am
” Despite Truman’s argument that his position as commander-in-chief afforded him the power to make all military decisions, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 11:43 am
The justices were well aware that public support for abortion was growing ever stronger; Justice Harry Blackmun, the author of Roe v. [read post]
