Search for: "Harris v. Public Broadcasting Service" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry faced two days of cross-examination this week as Fancourt J continued to hear the trial in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 am by INFORRM
A report was broadcast on the News at One, and a press statement issued by the singer was broadcast in full at around 2pm on the News Channel, Mr Smith said. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Importantly, many people fail to realize that C-SPAN is a private, non-profit company that is provided as a public service by cable industry contributions. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry’s claim against The Sun publisher News Group Newspapers will proceed to a full trial in the High Court, Duke of Sussex v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 1944 (Ch). [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
Harris, 36 Misc.3d 868, 949 N.Y.S.2d 590 (Criminal Court, City of New York, New York County 2012)). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Regulator will impose “conditions of service,” though not quite traditional broadcaster licensing. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Thus, under the logic of Keller, the makers of the recent film Selma might be liable for a host of right of publicity violations unless they got permission from Coretta Scott King, Andrew Young, John Lewis, Harry Belafonte, and the heirs of Martin Luther King, Jr., J. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Harris Cooperation Coporate responsibility Corporate responsibility Corporate responsibility corporate rights Corporation for Public Broadcasting Corruption Cost of cost of Cost-benefit calculation Coups Covid 19 Crawford v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by INFORRM
Unilateral variation of broadcasting spectrum licences – Data Broadcasting International Ltd and Simpleactive Ltd v Ofcom, Katrina Dick & Dee Miller, Entertainment Law Review Ent. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  All four judgments were then made public. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
 Fiona kicked of proceedings with a presentation explaining that many artistes were facing desperate times because streaming was considered (at least by the major record labels) to be a 'making available' right and so no 'Equitable Remuneration' would apply - which of course it would IF streaming was considered a form of broadcasting - a communication to the public. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
The judge in New York v Harris (2011NY080152) stated that “If  you post a tweet, just like if you scream it out the window, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
  The hearing was not reported in the press or by broadcasters. [read post]