Search for: "Harris v. Securities and Exchange Commission"
Results 121 - 140
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
An interesting exampleconcerns Harry Potter books. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am
The Home Office reaffirmed this response in part in a Dec. 11, 2017 written question and answer exchange. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
During that exchange, Roberts spoke a lot about Chief Justice John Marshall. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
Thank you for taking the time to participate in this Question and Answer exchange for our readers. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
” Vice President Kamala Harris criticized Beijing for undermining the rules-based order and threatening the sovereignty of other South China Sea nations. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(JIPLP) Harmonisation spreads westwards – Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (1709 Copyright Blog) In the pipeline: Future revision of the trade mark system in the EU (BLOG@IP::JUR) European Commission opts for Benelux-first registration policy (Class 46) New GIs: Alubia de La Bañeza-León PGI for Spanish bean; Colline Pontine PDO for Italian olive oil; Chirimoya de la Costa tropical de Granada-Málaga PDO for Spanish custard-apple (Class 46)… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The court found that the influencer could not give stock tips without an Australian Financial Services Licence and he was ordered to pay the legal bills of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, who filed the claim. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am
Sharesleuth took a closer look at the registration statement covering the resale of those shares, and found that no fewer than eight people who participated in the placement have been the subject of Securities and Exchange Commission actions or criminal prosecutions. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
., Broadcom v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
One particularly relevant case is Harris v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
Harry Calcutt was president, CEO, and chairman of the board of Northwestern Bank, a Michigan community bank. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm
” And he expresses grave concern about “the questionable effectiveness and accountability of some of the numerous independent regulatory agencies,” referring to agencies (like the Federal Elections Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission) run by individuals appointed by the president but only removable “for cause. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Until then, two different federal departments-and, briefly, an existing independent commission-imperfectly set aviation policy. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigated the defendant for fraudulent investment activities and obtained an order of disgorgement for more than $4 million dollars based on illegally obtained profits. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:16 pm
JUNE • Miranda v. [read post]
