Search for: "Hart v New York City Hous. Auth."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
Although, any provision of the Criminal Procedure Law which has the effect of limiting the Supreme Court's broad jurisdiction is arguably unconstitutional, it is well settled that issues of constitutionality should not be reached unnecessarily (see Comiskey v Arlen, 43 NY2d 696 [1977]; Peters v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
Under these circumstances, any purported failure on the part of Able to provide ACE with timely notice of the underlying claim did not excuse ACE's unreasonable delay in disclaiming coverage (see New York City Hous. [read post]
