Search for: "Hartman v. City of Providence" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court said that "self-interest inherent in adjudicating a dispute involving judicial compensation" otherwise provides grounds for disqualifying not only Justice Hartman, but every judge who might replace her. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The court said that "self-interest inherent in adjudicating a dispute involving judicial compensation" otherwise provides grounds for disqualifying not only Justice Hartman, but every judge who might replace her. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:18 am
Holding: The statutes that authorize cities and towns to provide water, sewer and sanitation services also authorize those cities and towns to hold property owners ultimately liable for the cost of providing those services to the property. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
In the nearly 50 years since the court’s decision in Mount Healthy, Gonzalez argues, the Supreme Court has only departed from that rule twice – in Hartman v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Heidi Kitrosser
” The city asked the court to answer that question in the affirmative by extending Hartman v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
[Lindsay Lohan attends DailyMail.com & DailyMailTV Holiday Party with Flo Rida on December 6, 2017 at The Magic Hour in New York City. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm by Orin Kerr
The Tenth Circuit precedents on this point allowed such a First Amendment claim for both retaliatory arrest and retaliatory prosecution, and the Supreme Court had subsequently decided the other way as to retaliatory prosecutions in Hartman v. [read post]
The Texas Supreme Court recently provided pointed guidance to litigants seeking attorney’s fees in a fee-shifting setting. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court in this case will be examining whether to extend a 2006 precedent, in the case of Hartman v. [read post]