Search for: "Harvester v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
The Sixth Circuit dismissed the Harvest Institute Freedman Federation’s claim against the Cobell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:57 am
Harvest v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
United States/Harvest Institute Freedmen Federation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Rochester, NY, attorney Paul V. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:27 pm
Council Action v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
In the case of The Green Earth Wellness Center, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
Smith, later consolidated into United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
<> State of Alaska v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
Stevens, 25 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1994) and Oliver v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 4:27 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:16 am
Harvest Inst. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:04 pm
V. parahaemolyticus naturally inhabits coastal waters in the United States and Canada and is present in higher concentrations during summer. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 2:14 am
Safe to say, for Deputy Attorney general Jeremy Friedlander, Harvest v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
Harvesting contact lists remains a risky business. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:56 am
It sued LPS under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and state anti-hacking law. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:10 pm
The State Department's 1999 guidelines were the subject of litigation in Earth Island Inst. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm
Pandemic safety measures intended for the fishing industry differ from state to state. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
<> Organized Village of Kake v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
An investigation initiated by the Alaska Wildlife Troopers Statewide Wildlife Investigations Unit revealed that on two occasions, in July of 2010 and again in July of 2011, the F/V US Intrepid harvested a total of over 56,000 pounds of lingcod by catch in waters of the Eastern Gulf of Alaska by use of Non-Pelagic Trawl gear during a federal fishery. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 4:14 pm
And totally agree both that the State's mistake here was inexcuable (which it forthrightly admits) and that it's not that great of a burden to say to a State, in esssence: "When the judiciary orders you to retry or release a prisoner within 60 days, and you don't, you can't just ignore the Order and continue to hold him; you've got to release him. [read post]
