Search for: "Harvey v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
  The meeting heard impassioned speeches from Sir Cliff Richard, Paul Gambaccini and Harvey Proctor – all falsely accused of such offences in the past. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C. has filed a figurative application for an image of the Empire State Building (see below) covering, among other things “non-fungible tokens (NFTs)” and “downloadable multimedia files containing artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs)” in Class 9 (see here).The sheer number of ‘Metaverse-related’ filings already present on the register indicates that brands are determined to secure their protection… [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
ReferencesAlban, L., Poulsen, M.K., Petersen, J.V., Lindegaard, L.L., Meinert, L., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Becky
The BoA noted that the Opposition Division did not state this to be the case here, nor had Pinball filed any arguments in this respect. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:26 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In its December 2021 decision in Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Emily Dai
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:12 am by Dale Burmeister
Home-Owners Insurance Company and Wolverine Mutual Insurance Company v State Auto Insurance Company, Oakland County Circuit Court, Hon. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
In one of the sexual assault lawsuits against Harvey Weinstein, for instance, the court reasoned: The Court cannot accept Plaintiff's "mere speculation" that Weinstein's defense would not be prejudiced by the condition that he "not disclose her name to the public," with no clear definition of what would constitute disclosure to "the public. [read post]