Search for: "Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d at 433. [read post]
