Search for: "Hasty Hills Stables, Inc. v Dorfman, Lynch, Knoebel & Conway, LLP" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In [*2]response, the plaintiff failed to present evidence establishing either that she commenced the action within the applicable three-year limitations period, or that the continuous representation toll applied in this case, since all of the documentary evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the legal representation had ended more than three years before this action was commenced, and there was no mutual understanding of a need for ongoing legal representation in the underlying matter… [read post]