Search for: "Hawkes v Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ninth Circuit said no, in Dariano v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
Hawkes Co. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:58 am
LEXIS 27702 (WD NY, March 30, 2007), a federal Magistrate Judge rejected a claim by a Sh'ia Muslim prisoner that he was denied the right to free exercise of religion by virtue of the New York Department of Corrections' policy of holding joint Friday prayer services for both Shi'a and Sunni Muslims. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:55 pm
Hawk-Sawyer, 2007 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:18 pm
Hawk Wing, 433 F.3d 622 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
Lhamon, Neal v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:23 pm
As the Court noted in Lewis v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Hawkes Co., Inc., 15-290, involve an important question under the Clean Water Act (CWA) – which experienced speed-readers recognize as a cue to skip to the next paragraph. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Hawk Talk blog raised four serious questions that arise from the recent decision ICO v Clearview AI [2023] UKFTT 819, handed down on 17 October 2023. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Hawks don’t want to press federal courts to clarify how widely it applies for fear of a ruling that would restrict executive power. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Seed Hawk Inc.: An element may be found to be essential on the basis of the intent of the inventor as expressed or inferred from the claims, or on the basis of evidence as to whether it would have been obvious to a skilled worker at the time the patent was published that a variant of a particular element would make a difference to the way in which the invention works (Free World at paragraphs 31 and 55).[355] Although the Free World test permits departing from the wording of the… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
