Search for: "Hay v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
The memo stated that, pending the outcome of the pilot, the guidance may be incorporated into the Internal Revenue Manual. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
The memo stated that, pending the outcome of the pilot, the guidance may be incorporated into the Internal Revenue Manual. [read post]
