Search for: "Hays v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by Ian Hull
The recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Kay v Kay Sr. is such a case. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The typical horse annually consumed about five acres of hay and grain – good for the rural economy. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
DC Gow indicated that she would discuss matters with her superior officer but that a search warrant might be sought.[5]        On 11 July 2016, in anticipation that an application for a warrant might be made, Mr Watson, on behalf of S wrote to the Sheriff Clerk in Edinburgh requesting that the Sheriff Clerk contact the complainers in the event of any application to the sheriff with a view to S being represented at any hearing before the sheriff. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:58 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
DeBlase v Superior Court (1996) 41 CA4th 1279, 1285. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:58 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
DeBlase v Superior Court (1996) 41 CA4th 1279, 1285. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 11:03 am by Sean Wajert
The court rejected this theory, and agreed with defendant that its flaws impacted predominance and superiority. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
Yes, he certainly did -- once he was instructed by his superiors that the division statute did not apply to the facts of this case. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:48 pm by Simon Chester
The decisions of the Superior Court of Justice can be found at: http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/. [read post]