Search for: "Haywood v. Haywood"
Results 1 - 20
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's decision also notes that mandamus "will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter of Wyche v Haywood-Diaz, 206 AD3d 748. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's decision also notes that mandamus "will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter of Wyche v Haywood-Diaz, 206 AD3d 748. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Judge Haywood S. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 7:09 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
Judge Haywood S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On Friday 21 July 2023 there was a hearing in the case of Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:33 am
Haywood v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:37 am
Case citation: Haywood v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm
The charges arose from a traffic stop in Haywood County. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:28 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
The complaint alleges that Haywood avoid losses of approximately $179,297. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 6:50 am
The facts of this Haywood County case were previously summarized here following the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:37 am
In Haywood v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:26 am
The response by the District Court (Judge Haywood S. [read post]
