Search for: "Hazen v. Hazen"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 11:46 am
D'Cunha v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:47 am
“If they are syndicating this to investors and indicating there is going to be some liquidity in a secondary market, those are the red flags that make it look very much like a security,” said Thomas Lee Hazen, an expert in securities law at the University of North Carolina School of Law. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Louis V. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
Harris has filed an amicus brief in Sebelius v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
However, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Hazen Paper Co v Biggins, which sanctioned employment decisions based on factors that correlate with age only if they are analytically distinct from age, the appeals court pointed that that the comments, when viewed in a light most favorable to the employee, boiled down to one theme: the company picked the other designer because he was younger. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
” Noting that the JHO found that Employee's conduct was only partially attributable to the disorders he claimed to suffer, the Appellate Division said that “the law does not immunize disabled employees from discipline or discharge for incidents of misconduct in the workplace,” citing Hazen v Hill Bettz and Nash, 92 AD3d 162, leave to appeal denied, 19 NY3d 812. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 7:37 am
Supreme Court has held in Hazen Paper Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am
Gabilondo, Thomas Lee Hazen. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:45 pm
EEOC, 554 U.S. 135 (2008), and Hazen Paper Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:01 am
Practice point: The New York State Human Rights Law does not immunize disabled employees from discipline or discharge for misconduct in the workplace.Student note: EEOC Guideline No. 30 specifically provides that an employer may discipline an individual with a disability for violating a workplace conduct standard which is job-related and consistent with business necessity.Case: Hazen v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:38 am
” The court held that “An employment decision motivated by pension costs, even when strongly correlated with age, is not an ADEA violation,’ citing Hazen Paper v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Cox and Thomas Lee Hazen. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am
It is also consistent with surveys of consumer preferences and with a 1999 United States Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:57 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:59 am
Supreme Court denied Hazen’s petition and the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s ruling.The Appellate Division explained that Hazen sought to compel the removal of the letters to which she objected from her file, which was an action in the nature of mandamus.However, said the court, placing the letters in her personnel file and deciding whether or not to remove then when Hazen demand their being expunged, are essentially discretionary actions. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:22 pm
Featured Doc: Case report: Crookes v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:06 am
Woodman v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 11:28 am
Hazen, 234 Ill. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:05 am
" Hazen Paper Co. v. [read post]
