Search for: "Hazen v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 7:06 am
Here are the briefs in State of Washington v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:11 am
Here is the opinion in State of Washington v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:13 am
Here are the materials in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am
The post FinCEN Update first appeared on Hazen Law Group LLC. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
” Noting that the JHO found that Employee's conduct was only partially attributable to the disorders he claimed to suffer, the Appellate Division said that “the law does not immunize disabled employees from discipline or discharge for incidents of misconduct in the workplace,” citing Hazen v Hill Bettz and Nash, 92 AD3d 162, leave to appeal denied, 19 NY3d 812. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:00 pm
The majority opinion, written by Justice Breyer, relied heavily on the Court's 1993 ruling in Hazen Paper Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:01 am
Practice point: The New York State Human Rights Law does not immunize disabled employees from discipline or discharge for misconduct in the workplace.Student note: EEOC Guideline No. 30 specifically provides that an employer may discipline an individual with a disability for violating a workplace conduct standard which is job-related and consistent with business necessity.Case: Hazen v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
Hazen Paper Co., 111 F.3d 205, 209 (1st Cir.1997)). [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:05 am
Here are the materials in Williams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
Focusing on its prior decision in Hazen Paper Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:32 am
Co. v Jones, 6 AD3d 534 [2004]; Hazen v Otsego Mut. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979) and Washington v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:57 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
The First Circuit heard oral argument on Wednesday in the matter of Boston Gas v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:47 am
” A few weeks ago, the IMF published its FSAP review of the United States, covering banking, insurance and securities. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
However, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Hazen Paper Co v Biggins, which sanctioned employment decisions based on factors that correlate with age only if they are analytically distinct from age, the appeals court pointed that that the comments, when viewed in a light most favorable to the employee, boiled down to one theme: the company picked the other designer because he was younger. [read post]
