Search for: "Head v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1 - 20
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm
The challenge will now head to the state Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
The complaint (full text) in von Rosenberg v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:28 pm
I wouldn’t mind South Carolina abolishing fault divorce. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 3:58 am
In this episode of my blog series we’re headed to South Carolina, the Palmetto State, to define insurable interests. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
South Carolina Worker’s Family Was Not Entitled to Benefits for Deceased Worker’s Death Because No Exception to the Coming and Going Rule Applied – Wofford v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:58 pm
South Carolina Worker’s Family Was Not Entitled to Benefits for Deceased Worker’s Death Because No Exception to the Coming and Going Rule Applied – Wofford v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:05 am
Earlier this week, a South Carolina federal district court issued another opinion in the long-running battle between competing Episcopal Church factions in South Carolina. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
The Diocese of South Carolina, a corporation headed by the Rt. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Plaintiffs’ mega-firm Motley Rice, based in Charleston, South Carolina, has filed two lawsuits – one in state court in Charleston and the second in South Carolina federal court. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 8:20 pm
The Zitos were residents of Timonium, Maryland and owned a beachfront lot at 10224 East Seagull Drive in South Nags Head, North Carolina. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:11 pm
(Mic Smith/Associated Press) The Citadel, a public military college run by South Carolina, “will not allow a Muslim student to wear a hijab, an exception she had requested to the required uniform to keep her head covered, in keeping with her faith. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
I have previously blogged about tort reform efforts in the South Carolina General Assembly this year. [read post]
