Search for: "Heard v. Hart" Results 41 - 60 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
Both parties agreed noot to await the Court of Appeal decision in Rakusen v Jepson (due to be heard in July 2021). [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
An edited and updated version will be published in 2021 in Hart´s “Studies in Private International Law”), in order to correct some of the shortcomings of the latter. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust 18 (1980). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am by Chukwuma Okoli
In circumstances where courts have not heard substantial argument on the Section 3(1) discretion and/or have exhibited a hostile attitude towards extending the time within which to make the application for registration[13], one would have expected a much greater role carved out for the common law action; one remains disappointed. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 9 November 2020, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Wan-Bissaka & anr v Bentley. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law case is outstanding: Nwakamma v Umeyor, heard 13 to 16 July 2020 (HHJ Lewis) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which we should be listing. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Aven v Orbis Business Intelligence, heard 16 to 19 March 2020 (Warby J) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 12 March 2020 (Nicklin J) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v V [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am by Simon Lester
[v] Here, we do not seek to describe the precise modalities of the IAAA,[vi]  or explore its potential political effects. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Victoria Barnes, and Emily Whewell, Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, have posted English Contract Law Moves East: Legal Transplants and the Doctrine of Misrepresentation in British Consular Courts, which appears in the Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 7 (2019): 26-48:This article analyses the legal conception of misrepresentation in the well-noted case of Von Gumpach v Hart (1870). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
The first is to interpret the concept of freedom of speech according to its origins, which was, as Lord Browne-Wilkinson put it in Pepper v Hart ‘to discuss what they [Parliament], as opposed to the monarch, chose to have discussed’ (p 638). [read post]