Search for: "Heard v. Withers" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2013, 6:03 am by Joe Patrice
[NBC News] * Elie argues with folks about Greece v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm by John Culhane
The questions on standing were pointed, withering, and perhaps decisive. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:10 am by Ronald Mann
The Justices certainly did not speak with one voice when they heard arguments Wednesday in Mississippi v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
When I heard that Robert Costello had asked to speak before the grand jury to rebut Cohen’s testimony, I was highly critical. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:14 pm by Harry Styron
For nearly 150 years, law students have been told about Rylands v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 1:47 am
Tim Bamford, partner in the Intellectual Property team at Withers LLP comments: “... [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Tugendhat J heard the adjournedCMC in Kim & anr v Tong & ors (part heard from 7 October 2011) and gave ex tempore rulings. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
Stilts are definitely nota good place to be ...Last week's inaugural lecture by Sir Robin Jacob reminded this Kat of the existence of a phrase which was heard a good deal more often in past times than one hears it today: "nonsense on stilts!" [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:22 am by Richard D. Friedman
Its position was bolstered by a unanimous judgment of the UK Supreme Court in R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14, [2010] 2 AC 373, in which the UK Supreme Court rejected various similar appeals, refused to follow the chamber decision, and subjected the “sole or decisive test” to withering criticism. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:37 am by Jeff Gamso
")Cross-examinations are rarely withering. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am by MBettman
On June 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
Can you imagine the young associate who has to face down the withering stare of a partner as (s)he explains that a key source has disappeared or contradicts the proposition for which it was cited? [read post]