Search for: "Hearn v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Texas Gov. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
United States, No. 10-463L (May 24, 2012), and Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm
Hearn’s opinion discusses United States Supreme Court jurisprudence at the time South Carolina adopted article I, section 10, noting that Griswold v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:01 am
United States, the case in which the Court of Federal claims dismissed the property owners' Fifth Amendment takings claim stemming from a rail conversion. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Episcopalians who are united in our desire to remain members in good standing in The Episcopal Church (TEC) and the Anglican Communion. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
"And indeed, as pointed out in Bishop Lawrence's response to the petition for mandamus, just one day before filing its motion for enforcement with Judge Dickson, ECUSA had filed a brief in opposition to Bishop Lawrence's petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ to review the August 2017 decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court (p. 4):On May 7, 2018, Petitioners [in the Circuit Court, i.e., ECUSA and its diocese] argued to the United… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
Jones, an 1872 decision by the United States Supreme Court that, among other irrelevant observations (called "obiter dicta", or "things said beside the point"), offered the view that the then-established Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America was hierarchical. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
But rehearing would be required in any event because the bias injected into the proceedings by Justice Hearn tainted not only her conclusions, but those of Acting Justice Pleicones and of Chief Justice Beatty, as well.In a nutshell, the fault exposed by the petition for rehearing is this: there is no 3-2 majority, or any majority, of the Court that is united in favor of any reasoning for any result that is dispositive of the entire case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
But rehearing would be required in any event because the bias injected into the proceedings by Justice Hearn tainted not only her conclusions, but those of Acting Justice Pleicones and of Chief Justice Beatty, as well.In a nutshell, the fault exposed by the petition for rehearing is this: there is no 3-2 majority, or any majority, of the Court that is united in favor of any reasoning for any result that is dispositive of the entire case. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
Scalia, naturally, dissented, because somebody has to take one for the team.Unfortunately, the jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court ends right about the Texas border, where the 5th Circuit has decided that Martinez may be fine for the United States, but has no place in the Republic of Texas. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:16 am
.,09 Civ. 8083 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:39 am
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
