Search for: "Hearn v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
United States, __ Fed. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:01 am
United States, No. 09-289 L (Oct. 25, 2011). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
United States, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 9:44 am
In what is, for me, one of the most highly anticipated decisions on this year’s docket, the South Carolina Supreme Court decided on September 19, 2011 in the case of Theisen v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. 6 Tex. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:16 am
.,09 Civ. 8083 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:19 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
United States, the Court will consider whether, for purposes of the ACCA, a prior state conviction for battery is in all cases a "violent felony," even when the state's highest court has held that the offense does not have as an element the use or threatened use of physical force. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Acton, MA; Brendan Hearn, President) Adam J. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
(Justice Willett not sitting)State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 1:44 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 11:02 pm
ACCA's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
