Search for: "Heck v. Humphrey"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 4:48 am
Heck v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Humphrey (and voted to reaffirm in cases like Nelson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 10:09 am
Heck v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
February 15, 2007).* Heck v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
City of Los Angeles, California 22-64Issues: (1) Whether Heck v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) bars defendant's claim because his assertion that he did not oppose being taken into custody contradicts his conviction for resisting arrest is reversed as, Wallace v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
In Heck v Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), the Supreme Court barred § 1983 actions for damages where a favorable judgment would necessarily impugn the validity of an outstanding criminal conviction. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm
See Heck v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:26 am
March 9, 2007), all without citing Heck v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:05 am
Specifically, although prisoners must seek federal habeas relief to challenge the fact or duration of their confinement, the Court nonetheless held in Heck v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
Humphrey in 1994 and Wallace v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
Ortiz-Marquez, 18-8369Issue: Whether prior Heck v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
Two of Lomax’s prior dismissals were based on Heck v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
The petitioner argued that his claim was barred by Heck v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Wallace v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
Galanti 23-186Issue: Whether there is an exception to the favorable-termination rule in Heck v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 8:19 am
Datzman 21-1179Issue: Whether the Heck v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:36 pm
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v. [read post]
