Search for: "Heck v. Humphrey"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
February 9, 2011) (unpublished): After careful consideration, we find all of Johnson's claims are barred by Heck v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 10:38 pm
Chesney explained that a prisoner cannot proceed on a false arrest claim for a crime for which that individual was convicted unless the conviction is overturned or the individual is exonerated under Heck v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:38 pm
Per Cohen v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:40 am
Coleman, who represents DA Lynn Switzer in the case, and who was featured in the last issue of Texas Super Lawyers, says that there is a line of cases, including Heck v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:05 am
Specifically, although prisoners must seek federal habeas relief to challenge the fact or duration of their confinement, the Court nonetheless held in Heck v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:38 pm
Humphrey rule in Peterson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) bars defendant's claim because his assertion that he did not oppose being taken into custody contradicts his conviction for resisting arrest is reversed as, Wallace v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
His claim is barred by Heck v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Heck v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:48 am
Heck v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
Under Heck v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
In Heck v Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), the Supreme Court barred § 1983 actions for damages where a favorable judgment would necessarily impugn the validity of an outstanding criminal conviction. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 12:34 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
Humphrey (1994). [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:28 am
Heck v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:36 pm
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and Edwards v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 5:12 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:50 am
Heck v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
Humphrey does not require otherwise. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
Humphrey does not require otherwise. [read post]
